anon-16935's picture From anon-16935 rss RSS 

Corporate Strategy 



 
Views:  3155
Downloads:  61
Published:  March 28, 2008
 
0
save to favorite
ask author to add audio Ask author to add audio
Share plick with friends Share
mark as inappropriate Mark as inappropriate
 
Related Plicks
Corporate Strategy

Corporate Strategy

From: davidwalker
Views: 4906 Comments: 0

 
Reusability Guidelines

Reusability Guidelines

From: hillmarket
Views: 1866 Comments: 0

 
Developing CRM Strategy

Developing CRM Strategy

From: jane
Views: 2831 Comments: 0
What is a customer relationship management (CRM) strategy?
How does a CRM strategy fit in with other business strategies?
Only 10 percent to 15 percent of companies know the value of their customer b (more)

 
Gartner -  Developing CRM Strategy

Gartner - Developing CRM Strategy

From: babo
Views: 2823 Comments: 0
What is a customer relationship management (CRM) strategy?
How does a CRM strategy fit in with other business strategies?
Only 10 percent to 15 percent of companies know the value of their customer b (more)

 
MLW03 Fifer Canby Nat Geographic

MLW03 Fifer Canby Nat Geographic

From: jane
Views: 846 Comments: 0
What is “white space”?
Geographic Context
Redefinition: Six Strategies
Questions

 
Strategy Execution process

Strategy Execution process

From: sarvajeet
Views: 23 Comments: 0

 
See all 
 
More from this user
Commercial Property Consultant

Commercial Property Consultant

From: anon-16935
Views: 2390
Comments: 0

 
See all 
 
Place your Ad here for $2.00 a month
Sample Ad
Advertise your business on myplick.
Only $2.00 a month.
 
 URL:          AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Embed Thin Player: (fits in most blogs)
Embed Full Player :
 
 

Name

Email (will NOT be shown to other users)

 

 
 
Comments:
 
 
Notes:
 
 
Slide 1: Today’s News  Pepsi’s challenges  Spun-off restaurants  Acquired Tropicana  Pepsi Bottling IPO  Disney -- Retail stores  Baby merchandize  White goods  Paint  AT&T  Spin-off or sell Consumer Long Distance unit  Maxtor acquires Quantum HDD unit
Slide 2: Corporate Strategy Q: What businesses are we in? How did we get there? Single Business Product Line Expansion Geographic Expansion/ Vertical Integration Diversification Related / Unrelated
Slide 3: Diversification and Poker J 3 8 8 K Q 10  2 7 4 3 4 7 J 3
Slide 4: Why Diversify?? Division Sales ($) Q1 Q2 1994 Q3 Q4 Industry Growth (%) 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998
Slide 5: Benefits of Diversification  Reduce earnings volatility  Minimize risk  Move firm into attractive industries  Prolong “life” of firm  Improve long-term performance  Capture synergies and strategic “fit” between businesses  Steer corporate resources
Slide 6: Types of Diversification  Vertical  Horizontal  Related  Unrelated  Global
Slide 7: Evaluation of Diversified Firms  Identify present corporate strategy  extent and type of diversification  geographic scope  new acquisitions  recent divestitures  mode of new business entry
Slide 8: Evaluation of Diversified Firms  Reveal contextual position of corporate portfolio BCG Growth-share Matrix Industry Growth Rate Hi Lo < 1.0 1.0 > 1.0 Relative Market Share
Slide 9: Evaluation of Diversified Firms • Reveal competitive position of corporate portfolio - G.E. Industry attractiveness/business strength matrix Industry Long Term Attractiveness H M L Str. Avg. Weak Firm’s Competitive Position
Slide 10: Diversified Inc. HQ Bus. 1 Growth Size Remote Env. Bus. 2 Growth Size Remote Env. Bus. 3 Growth Size Remote Env. $ $ $
Slide 11: Entering New Businesses  WHY?  Does business fit?  Financially  Strategically  Culturally  If not in this business today, would we want to get into it now?  HOW?  Acquisition  Internal start-up  Joint ventures
Slide 12: Why M&A Activity?  Intensifying competition  Global markets  Growth in new industries  NOTE:  20% of all-time corporate mergers have occurred within last 18 months
Slide 13: Justifications  Attractiveness test  Industry factors  Core competencies  Strategic position  Cost of entry test  Buy outstanding shares  Cash  Contributions to merger or JV  Better off test  Synergies, econ. of scale/scope  Consolidation of resources, activities  Competitive advantage?
Slide 14: Why MBC’s “Should” Outperform SBC’s  Economies of Scope  Intangible assets - brand  Consolidate operations  Efficient Resource Allocation  MBC as “internal” capital market  Increased Size  Lower cost of capital  Increased market power
Slide 15: Why MBC’s Actually Underperform SBCs  Why does stock price of acquirer always go down?  Diseconomies of Scope  Leadership - bureaucracy  Capital Allocation  Democratic process  Cross-subsidization (e.g., AT&T)  Misaligned Incentives  Too short-term  Underdeveloped Corporate Strategy
Slide 16: International Diversification  WHY?  slow domestic growth (earnings risk?)  intense domestic rivalry  no overseas competition  intense overseas competition  HOW?  Exporting  Franchising  Joint ventures  Wholly-owned subsidiaries Greenfield (internal development)  Mergers & Acquisitions 
Slide 17: Alternative Corporate Strategies  Portfolio “juggling” ...  Evolutionary Approach  Corporate Transformation  Sudden Redefinition
Slide 18: Portfolio Managers  Turnaround  restore competitiveness to poor performers  New advantages created within portfolio  Retrenchment  narrow scope of portfolio  “stick to your knitting”  Restructuring  add new businesses / divest poor performers
Slide 19: Evolutionary Approach: Leveraging Competence  Performance culture (3M, ABB)  Business system replicator (Gillette)  Capability leverager (Nike)  Valuator (Berkshire Hathaway)  Inventor (H-P, J&J)  Synergy capturer (Kraft-Genl. Foods)  Cost squeezer (Sunbeam)
Slide 20: Disney: Capability Bundling  Films Toy Story  Videos  Network TV  Cable TV  Hotels ark  Cruise lines eP em  Merchandise Th  Brand licensing  NEW … is e nd ha Retail Stores rc e TV Sh ow Fo od ms I te M
Slide 21: Corp. Transformation  Choosing new businesses  Planned Surprises  Change business portfolio (Monsanto)  Change global portfolio (CitiBank)  Capability bundling (Disney)  Industry consolidation (Chrysler) Total Return Biotech (38%) S&P MTC Chemicals (18%) 1994
Slide 22: Transformation  Nokia  1989: Diversified electrical conglomerate  1993: 87% telecom focus Total Return Nokia Motorola S&P Eriksson 1993
Slide 23: Sudden Redefinition  Competitive/performance crisis  Massive immediate corporate portfolio change  Deregulation  Patents  Foreign competition  M&A in same/related industries

   
Time on Slide Time on Plick
Slides per Visit Slide Views Views by Location
close
Please fill out the form below. You will be asked to make your payment to Myplick (Eastar Technologies) via Paypal. Your request will be processed within 24 hours after your submission.
 
Title (max 25 characters)
Link (placed on title)
Content (max 100 characters)
You have successfully submitted your ad request. Please send your payment to ericandlei@myplick.com via PAYPAL.
Ad submission failed. Please report the problem to ericandlei@myplick.com.